Case Law Academy

Topic

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights

5 published cases

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights2001533 U.S. 194

Saucier

Saucier v. Katz held that qualified immunity in excessive force cases is not identical to the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry. Courts must separately consider whether the alleged facts show a constitutional violation and whether that right was clearly established in the specific circumstances. The Court granted qualified immunity to the military police officer.

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights2009555 U.S. 223

Pearson

Pearson v. Callahan changed qualified immunity procedure. The Court held that judges are no longer required to decide the constitutional violation question before asking whether the law was clearly established. The officers won qualified immunity because existing law had not clearly prohibited the warrantless entry under the consent-once-removed theory.

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights1978436 U.S. 658

Monell

In Monell, the Supreme Court overruled part of Monroe v. Pape and held that local governments are 'persons' under § 1983. Municipalities may be liable when official policy or custom causes a constitutional violation, but not simply because they employ the person who committed the violation.

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights1982457 U.S. 800

Harlow

Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), created the modern objective qualified immunity test: federal officials performing discretionary duties are protected from damages unless they violate clearly established rights a reasonable official would have known.

Qualified Immunity Civil Rights1989489 U.S. 378

City of Canton

City of Canton v. Harris held that a municipality can be liable under § 1983 for failure to train police employees, but only when the failure reflects deliberate indifference to constitutional rights and causes the injury. The case is a foundation of modern Monell municipal-liability doctrine.